Publikasi Scopus 2024 per tanggal 30 September 2024 (820 artikel)

Gunawan E.J.; Johan; Munawar D.A.; Munawar D.L.; Hartono B.; Munawar M.
Gunawan, Evan Jim (57814388100); Johan (59245268700); Munawar, Dian Andina (56470745000); Munawar, Dian Larasati (59224761300); Hartono, Beny (46961152700); Munawar, Muhammad (16747447600)
57814388100; 59245268700; 56470745000; 59224761300; 46961152700; 16747447600
Early Experience of Left Bundle Branch Pacing with Lumenless Lead in a Single Center: A Case Series
2024
Acta Medica Indonesiana
56
2
227
232
5
0
Binawaluya Cardiac Center, Jakarta, Indonesia; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
Gunawan E.J., Binawaluya Cardiac Center, Jakarta, Indonesia; Johan, Binawaluya Cardiac Center, Jakarta, Indonesia; Munawar D.A., Binawaluya Cardiac Center, Jakarta, Indonesia, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia; Munawar D.L., Binawaluya Cardiac Center, Jakarta, Indonesia; Hartono B., Binawaluya Cardiac Center, Jakarta, Indonesia; Munawar M., Binawaluya Cardiac Center, Jakarta, Indonesia, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has been subject to increasing interest over the last few years due to its capacity for physiological conduction and its advantages compared to His bundle pacing. His bundle pacing has certain limitations, such as a small pacing area for the His bundle, a high threshold that leads to battery depletion, a low R-wave amplitude that may result in atrial or His oversensing, and ventricular signal undersensing. In this case series, four patients (two female and two male) aged 62.2 ± 8.4 years old with symptomatic sick sinus disease and no scar tissue in the interventricular septum underwent LBBP. All LBBPs were done with standard LBBP using a lumenless SelectSecure 3830 lead (Medtronic®, Minneapolis, USA) with a fixed helix. The lead parameters showed a good R-wave amplitudes (13 ± 7.4 mV) and a low threshold (0.77 ± 0.17 V @ 0.4 ms). All patients were discharged on the next day. During follow-up period of 13.3 ± 12.9 months, all patients were well and no complications were noted. In conclusion, LBBP may be as an alternative of novel conduction pacing techniques and can be done relatively easy and safe, even with limited experience center. © 2024, Indonesian Society of Internal Medicine. All rights reserved.
Left bundle branch pacing; novel conduction system pacing; pacemaker; sick sinus syndrome
Aged; Bundle of His; Bundle-Branch Block; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial; Electrocardiography; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pacemaker, Artificial; Sick Sinus Syndrome; Treatment Outcome; aged; artificial heart pacemaker; case report; electrocardiography; female; heart bundle branch block; heart pacing; His bundle; human; male; middle aged; pathophysiology; procedures; sick sinus syndrome; therapy; treatment outcome
Indonesian Society of Internal Medicine
01259326
39010770
Article
Q3
256
17265