Riset dan Pengabdian Masyarakat
Do Research Sosial Service and Innovation
Publikasi Scopus 2024 per tanggal 30 November 2024 (994 artikel)
Publikasi Scopus 2024 per tanggal 30 November 2024 (994 artikel)
Soetisna, Tri Wisesa (57214887740); Thamrin, Ahmad Muslim Hidayat (58192261300); Ilham, Mahardika Budjana Sutan (57221919120); Darmawan, Marko (59262507500); Irfan, Faris Maulana (59263123600); Supit, Vicky (59262813500); Sugisman (57224162065); Hanafy, Dudy Arman (57220157579); Tjubandi, Amin (57211055979); Wartono, Dicky Aligheri (12766488300); Graha, Wirya Ayu (59262507600)
No-touch technique for saphenous vein graft harvesting in coronary artery bypass surgery safely improves graft patency: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
2024
Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
1
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85201376077&doi=10.1007%2fs12055-024-01788-5&partnerID=40&md5=59d35d55ac285c2291d88baef72dd59f
Adult Cardiac Surgery Division, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Harapan Kita National Cardiovascular Center Hospital, S. Parman Street Cavling 87, Jakarta, 11420, Indonesia; Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia; Faculty of Medicine, Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University, Haji Hospital, Jakarta, 13560, Indonesia
Objective: The no-touch (NT) technique for saphenous vein graft (SVG) harvesting has been gaining popularity as several trials have shown its superiority in maintaining graft patency. However, this technique’s clinical outcome and safety are still disputed and the results vary widely. The aim of this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was to assess the effectiveness and safety of this method. Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were conducted for this systematic review and meta-analysis. A comprehensive search of the literature was carried out with Embase, Scopus, and PubMed databases. The articles underwent extensive evaluation and analysis. Results: Six RCTs comparing the NT and conventional (CON) techniques were included. Primary outcomes were measured using graft occlusion. Graft failure rates and clinical outcomes including major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), all-cause death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and leg wound complications were evaluated as secondary outcomes. The NT technique significantly decreased graft occlusion (risk ratio (RR) = 0.58; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.46 to 0.72; p < 0.001) and failure (RR = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.54 to 0.77; p < 0.001). Safety analysis also showed no significant risk difference for clinical outcomes, and although significantly higher, leg complications in the NT technique are minor and avoidable. Conclusion: The NT technique increases long-term graft patency with no significant risk difference for clinical outcomes compared to the CON technique. However, the leg wound complications are significantly higher in the NT technique compared to the CON technique. Graphical Abstract: (Figure presented.) © The Author(s) 2024.
Springer
09709134
Article
Q3
273
16625