Publikasi Scopus FKUI 2021 per tanggal 31 Oktober 2021 (739 artikel)

Pranata R., Vania A., Vania R., Victor A.A.
57201973901;57215722420;57208328436;57191055282;
Intravitreal ranibizumab versus dexamethasone implant in macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion: Systematic review and meta-analysis
2021
European Journal of Ophthalmology
31
4
1907
1914
Universitas Pelita Harapan, Tangerang, Banten, Indonesia; Universitas Kristen Krida WacanaWest Jakarta, Indonesia; Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, National General Hospital, Jakarta, Daerah Istimewa Jakarta, Indonesia
Pranata, R., Universitas Pelita Harapan, Tangerang, Banten, Indonesia; Vania, A., Universitas Kristen Krida WacanaWest Jakarta, Indonesia; Vania, R., Universitas Pelita Harapan, Tangerang, Banten, Indonesia; Victor, A.A., Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, National General Hospital, Jakarta, Daerah Istimewa Jakarta, Indonesia
Purpose: Intravitreal ranibizumab (RNB) and dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DII) were developed in the recent past and has been widely used for macular edema secondary to BRVO. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab (RNB) compared to dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DII) in patients with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Methods: We performed a comprehensive search on topics that assess RNB and DII in patients with macular edema secondary to BRVO from several electronic databases. Results: There were 678 subjects from five studies. Ranibizumab was associated with a greater increase in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; mean difference 9.13, I2: 0%) compared to DII. Ranibizumab also demonstrated a greater ?10 (OR 2.76, I2: 0%) and ?15 letters (OR 2.78, I2: 0%) gain. RNB has better BCVA (logMAR scale) improvement at 6 months? follow up (mean difference ?0.15, I2: 64%) in favor of RNB. Higher IOP was found in DII group on follow-up (mean difference ?2.92, I2: 89%) and RNB has lesser IOP ?10 mmHg increase compared to DII (OR 0.08, I2: 0%). Cataract formation and/or progression was less in RNB (OR 0.53, I2: 75%). The need for rescue laser was similar the two groups. Conclusion: Intravitreal RNB was more effective with less pronounced effect on IOP and cataract formation and/or progression compared to DII for patients with macular edema secondary to BRVO. ? The Author(s) 2020.
branch retinal vein occlusion; dexamethasone; Intravitreal; macular edema; ranibizumab
dexamethasone; ranibizumab; angiogenesis inhibitor; dexamethasone; glucocorticoid; ranibizumab; Article; best corrected visual acuity; branch retinal vein occlusion; cataract extraction; central retinal thickness; comparative effectiveness; controlled study; cost effectiveness analysis; disease exacerbation; drug safety; Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study; follow up; human; intervention study; intraocular pressure; macular edema; meta analysis; qualitative analysis; quality control; randomized controlled trial (topic); retina vein occlusion; retinal thickness; sensitivity analysis; systematic review; visual acuity; complication; intravitreal drug administration; macular edema; retina vein occlusion; treatment outcome; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Dexamethasone; Glucocorticoids; Humans;
SAGE Publications Ltd
11206721
32757629
Article
Q2
790
6120