Publikasi Scopus 2024 per tanggal 30 September 2024 (820 artikel)

Mulyadi R.; Hasan I.; Sidipratomo P.; Putri P.P.
Mulyadi, Rahmad (56403164500); Hasan, Irsan (12776850800); Sidipratomo, Prijo (55674568400); Putri, Pungky Permata (58804289200)
56403164500; 12776850800; 55674568400; 58804289200
Prognosis of transarterial chemoembolization-sorafenib compared to transarterial chemoembolization-alone in hepatocellular carcinoma stage C: a systematic review
2024
Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute
36
1
18
0
Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia; Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
Mulyadi R., Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia; Hasan I., Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia; Sidipratomo P., Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia; Putri P.P., Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
Background: This systematic review aims to compare the prognosis of treatment transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with sorafenib and TACE-alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with Barcelona clinic liver cancer-stage C (BCLC-C). Materials and methods: A systematic search was conducted on five electronic databases: PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus. Studies were included if they compared overall survival (OS) of TACE-Sorafenib to TACE-alone in patients with HCC BCLC-C within the 2019–2023 timeframe. We excluded studies consisting of conference abstracts, letters, editorials, guidelines, case reports, animal studies, trial registries, and unpublished work. The selected articles were evaluated from August 2023 to September 2023. The journal’s quality was assessed with NOS for a non-randomized controlled trial. Results: This systematic review included four studies following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA). All four studies compared the OS of 401 patients with TACE-sorafenib to TACE-alone. Two studies compared time-to-progression (TTP), one study compared progression-free survival (PFS), and two studies compared disease control rate (DCR). There were various population criteria, TACE techniques used, risk factors, follow-up time, and adverse events. The collected evidence generally suggested that the combination of TACE-sorafenib is superior compared to TACE-alone. Due to a lack of essential data for the included study, a meta-analysis couldn't be performed. Conclusion: The results of this systematic review suggested that TACE-sorafenib combination therapy in patients with HCC BCLC-C improves OS superior compared to TACE-alone, without a notable increase in adverse events. © The Author(s) 2024.
Hepatocellular carcinoma; Neoplasm staging; Sorafenib; Survival analysis; Transarterial chemoembolization
Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemoembolization, Therapeutic; Combined Modality Therapy; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Neoplasm Staging; Prognosis; Sorafenib; Treatment Outcome; antineoplastic agent; sorafenib; cancer staging; chemoembolization; comparative study; human; liver cell carcinoma; liver tumor; mortality; multimodality cancer therapy; pathology; procedures; prognosis; therapy; treatment outcome
Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
11100362
38797810
Review
Q3
537
10084