Publikasi Scopus 2024 per tanggal 30 September 2024 (820 artikel)

Deviandri R.; van der Veen H.C.; Purba A.K.R.; Icanervilia A.V.; Lubis A.M.T.; van den Akker-Scheek I.; Postma M.J.
Deviandri, Romy (57222171014); van der Veen, Hugo C. (6603890936); Purba, Abdul Khairul R. (57202981220); Icanervilia, Ajeng V. (57212107858); Lubis, Andri MT. (15122639800); van den Akker-Scheek, Inge (57208219379); Postma, Maarten J. (7006296502)
57222171014; 6603890936; 57202981220; 57212107858; 15122639800; 57208219379; 7006296502
Cost-utility analysis of early reconstruction surgery versus conservative treatment for anterior cruciate ligament injury in a lower-middle income country
2024
BMC Health Services Research
24
1
784
0
Department of Orthopedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Department of Surgery-Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Riau, Arifin Achmad Hospital, Diponegoro street no 1, Pekanbaru, 28133, Indonesia; Division of Orthopedics-Sports Injury, Fit Centre Institute, Pekanbaru, Indonesia; Department of Pharmacology and Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia; Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Department of Economics, Econometrics & amp; Finance, Faculty of Economics & amp; Business, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Department of Pharmacology & amp; Therapy, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia; Center of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia; Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia; Department of Orthopedics-Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
Deviandri R., Department of Orthopedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands, Department of Surgery-Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Riau, Arifin Achmad Hospital, Diponegoro street no 1, Pekanbaru, 28133, Indonesia, Division of Orthopedics-Sports Injury, Fit Centre Institute, Pekanbaru, Indonesia; van der Veen H.C., Department of Orthopedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Purba A.K.R., Department of Pharmacology and Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia; Icanervilia A.V., Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia; Lubis A.M.T., Department of Orthopedics-Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia; van den Akker-Scheek I., Department of Orthopedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Postma M.J., Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands, Department of Economics, Econometrics & amp; Finance, Faculty of Economics & amp; Business, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands, Department of Pharmacology & amp; Therapy, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia, Center of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
Background: The ideal approach for treating anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is still disputed. This study aimed to determine the more cost-effective strategy by comparing early ACL reconstruction (ACLR) surgery to conservative treatment (rehabilitation with optional delayed reconstruction) for ACL injury in a lower/middle-income country (LMIC), Indonesia. Methods: A decision tree model was constructed for cost-utility analysis of early ACLR versus conservative treatment. The transition probabilities between states were obtained from the literature review. Utilities were measured by the EQ-5D-3 L from a prospective cohort study in a local hospital. The costs were obtained from a previous study that elaborated on the burden and cost of ACLR in Indonesia. Effectiveness was expressed in quality-adjusted life years gained (QALYs). Principal outcome measure was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). Willingness-to-pay was set at US$12,876 — three times the Indonesian GDP per capita in 2021 — the currently accepted standard in Indonesia as suggested by the World Health Organization Choosing Interventions that are Cost-Effective criterion (WHO-CHOICE). Results: The early ACLR group showed an incremental gain of 0.05 QALYs over the conservative treatment group, with a higher overall cost to society of US$976. The ICER of ACLR surgery was US$19,524 per QALY, above the WTP threshold of US$12,876. The ICER was sensitive to cost of conservative treatment, cost of ACLR, and rate of cross-over to delayed ACLR numbers in the conservative treatment group. Using the WTP threshold of US$12,876, the probability of conservative treatment being preferred over early ACLR was 64%. Conclusions: Based on the current model, early ACLR surgery does not seem more cost-effective compared to conservative treatment for ACL injury patients in Indonesia. Because the result was sensitive to the rate of cross-over probabilities from the conservative treatment alone to delayed ACLR, a future study with a long-term perspective is needed to further elucidate its impact. © The Author(s) 2024.
ACL rupture; Cost-effectiveness; LMIC; Reconstruction; Rehabilitation
Adult; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction; Conservative Treatment; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Trees; Developing Countries; Female; Humans; Indonesia; Male; Prospective Studies; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; adult; anterior cruciate ligament injury; anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; comparative study; conservative treatment; cost benefit analysis; decision tree; developing country; economics; female; human; Indonesia; male; prospective study; quality adjusted life year; surgery; therapy
BioMed Central Ltd
14726963
38982438
Article
Q1
1029
4238