Publikasi Scopus 2010 s/d 2022

Maulahela H., Simadibrata M., Nelwan E.J., Rahadiani N., Renesteen E., Suwarti S.W.T., Anggraini Y.W.
57189612709;23499598400;14527452900;16426455700;57216633036;55550498500;57475183300;
Recent advances in the diagnosis of intestinal tuberculosis
2022
BMC Gastroenterology
22
1
89
6
Division of Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia-Cipto Mangunkusumo National Central General Hospital, Infectious Diseases and Immunology Research Center, Indonesian Medical Education and Research Institute (IMERI), Jakarta, Indonesia; Division of Tropical Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Infectious Diseases and Immunology Research Center, Indonesian Medical Education and Research Institute (IMERI), Jakarta, Indonesia; Department of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia-Cipto Mangunkusumo National Central General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia; Infectious Diseases and Immunology Research Center, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Indonesian Medical Education and Research Institute (IMERI), Jakarta, Indonesia
Maulahela, H., Division of Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia-Cipto Mangunkusumo National Central General Hospital, Infectious Diseases and Immunology Research Center, Indonesian Medical Education and Research Institute (IMERI), Jakarta, Indonesia; Simadibrata, M., Division of Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia-Cipto Mangunkusumo National Central General Hospital, Infectious Diseases and Immunology Research Center, Indonesian Medical Education and Research Institute (IMERI), Jakarta, Indonesia; Nelwan, E.J., Division of Tropical Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Infectious Diseases and Immunology Research Center, Indonesian Medical Education and Research Institute (IMERI), Jakarta, Indonesia; Rahadiani, N., Department of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia-Cipto Mangunkusumo National Central General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia; Renesteen, E., Infectious Diseases and Immunology Research Center, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Indonesian Medical Education and Research Institute (IMERI), Jakarta, Indonesia; Suwarti, S.W.T., Infectious Diseases and Immunology Research Center, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Indonesian Medical Education and Research Institute (IMERI), Jakarta, Indonesia; Anggraini, Y.W., Infectious Diseases and Immunology Research Center, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Indonesian Medical Education and Research Institute (IMERI), Jakarta, Indonesia
Background: Intestinal tuberculosis still has a high incidence, especially in developing countries. The biggest challenge of this disease is the establishment of the diagnosis because the clinical features are not typical. Investigations such as culture, acid-fast bacilli (AFB) staining, and histopathology have low sensitivity, so other investigations are needed. Latest molecular-based diagnostic modalities such as GeneXpert, interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) release assays (IGRA), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), multiplex-PCR, and immunological markers are expected to help diagnose intestinal tuberculosis. This article review will examine the latest diagnostic modalities that can be used as a tool in establishing the diagnosis of intestinal tuberculosis. Results: Through a literature search, we were able to review the diagnostic values of various available diagnostic modalities as the appropriate additional test in intestinal tuberculosis. Culture as a gold standard has a sensitivity and specificity value of 9.3% and 100% with the MGIT BACTEC system as the most recommended medium. The sensitivity values of AFB staining, histopathology examination, GeneXpert, IGRA, PCR, multiplex-PCR and, immunological markers were ranged between 17.3 and 31%; 68%; 81–95.7%; 74–88%; 21.6–65%; 75.7–93.1%; and 52–87%, respectively. Meanwhile the specificity values were 100%; 77.1%; 91–100%; 74–87%; 93–100%; 96.4–100%; and 70–95%, respectively. Conclusion: The combination of clinical examination, conventional examination, and the latest molecular-based examination is the best choice for establishing the diagnosis of intestinal tuberculosis. Most recent modalities such as multiplex PCR and immunological marker examinations are diagnostic tools that deserve to be used in diagnosing intestinal tuberculosis as their sensitivity and specificity values are quite high and more evidences are expected to support the application of these examinations shortly soon. © 2022, The Author(s).
Diagnosis; GenExpert; IGRA; Immunological marker; Intestinal tuberculosis; Multiplex-PCR; PCR
biological marker; acid fast bacterium; Article; bacterium culture; clinical examination; clinical feature; diagnostic value; gold standard; human; interferon gamma release assay; intestinal tuberculosis; multiplex polymerase chain reaction; sensitivity and specificity; gastrointestinal tuberculosis; genetics; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; polymerase chain reaction; tuberculous peritonitis; Humans; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Peritonitis, Tuberculous; Polymerase Chain Reaction; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tuberculosis, Gastrointestinal
Universitas Indonesia
We thank the following contributors for their essential contribution to this review article: Intan Aziz, MD, Enrico Christian, MD, Jaffray DP Rambak, MD, and Samudra Andi Yusuf, MD.
The authors would like to thank Universitas Indonesia for funding this research through PUTI Grant with contact number NKB-5/UN2.RST/HKP.05.00/0020.
BioMed Central Ltd
1471230X
35227196
Article
Q2
737
6393