Publikasi Scopus 2010 s/d 2022

Maulahela H., Fauzi A., Renaldi K., Srisantoso Q.P., Jasmine A.
57189612709;36518523000;57190963547;57909513100;57909094300;
Current role of endoscopic ultrasound for gastrointestinal and abdominal tuberculosis
2022
JGH Open
6
11
745
753
Division of Gastroenterology, Pancreatobiliary, and Digestive Endoscopy, Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia-Cipto Mangunkusumo National Central General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
Maulahela, H., Division of Gastroenterology, Pancreatobiliary, and Digestive Endoscopy, Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia-Cipto Mangunkusumo National Central General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia; Fauzi, A., Division of Gastroenterology, Pancreatobiliary, and Digestive Endoscopy, Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia-Cipto Mangunkusumo National Central General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia; Renaldi, K., Division of Gastroenterology, Pancreatobiliary, and Digestive Endoscopy, Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia-Cipto Mangunkusumo National Central General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia; Srisantoso, Q.P., Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia; Jasmine, A., Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
A high incidence of tuberculosis (TB), especially in endemic countries, makes this infectious disease a concern. Abdominal TB contributes to 10% of extrapulmonary TB. Due to nonspecific clinical, radiological, and endoscopic findings, diagnosing abdominal TB continues to be a challenge. Hence, a precise diagnosis is needed. The diagnosis of gastrointestinal disease using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is often performed due to its high resolution and ability to provide a real-time visual representation of the gastrointestinal tract and extramural structures. EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and fine-needle biopsy (FNB) have helped diagnose TB as they offer an adequate specimen for cytology or histopathological examination. This method is considered safer, more effective, and more efficient. The capacity of EUS to diagnose abdominal TB based on the affected organs was examined via a literature search. We reviewed the role of EUS in diagnosing esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, peripancreatic, hepatosplenic, peritoneal, and intestinal TB. Generally, EUS aids in diagnosing abdominal TB. In some organs, it is superior to other diagnostic modalities. However, further examinations, such as cytology or histopathology and microbial, are still needed. We also studied the roles of EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB. EUS-FNA has shown a high diagnostic yield in esophageal (94.3–100%), pancreatic and peripancreatic (76.2%), and intestinal TB (84.1%). As minimally invasive methods, EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB can successfully provide sufficient samples. EUS is a functional diagnostic modality for abdominal TB. EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB provide sufficient samples safely and efficiently for further cytology, histopathology, and microbial examinations. © 2022 The Authors. JGH Open published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
abdominal tuberculosis; endoscopic ultrasound; endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration; endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy
abdominal tuberculosis; acid fast bacterium; autoimmune pancreatitis; dysphagia; endoscopic biopsy; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; endoscopic ultrasonography; endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle biopsy; extrapulmonary tuberculosis; fine needle aspiration biopsy; gastrointestinal tuberculosis; hematuria; human; laparotomy; lymphadenopathy; lymphocyte count; mediastinum lymph node; odynophagia; pancreas carcinoma; pancreatitis; pneumothorax; polymerase chain reaction; portal hypertension; retrosternal pain; Review; rifampicin resistance; sensitivity and specificity; sphincterotomy; stomach emptying; tuberculous lymphadenitis; tuberculous peritonitis
John Wiley and Sons Inc
23979070
Review
Q3
489
10212