Publikasi Scopus 2010 s/d 2022

Simadibrata D.M., Syam A.F., Lee Y.Y.
57202134322;8443384400;56191149300;
A comparison of efficacy and safety of potassium-competitive acid blocker and proton pump inhibitor in gastric acid-related diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis
2022
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)
37
12
2217
2228
3
Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia – Ciptomangunkusumo General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia; School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Malaysia; GI Function and Motility Unit, Hospital USM, Kota Bharu, Malaysia
Simadibrata, D.M., Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia; Syam, A.F., Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia – Ciptomangunkusumo General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia; Lee, Y.Y., School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Malaysia, GI Function and Motility Unit, Hospital USM, Kota Bharu, Malaysia
Background and Aim: Potassium-competitive acid blocker (PCAB) is a recent alternative to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) for potent acid suppression. The current systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of PCAB versus PPI in treating gastric acid-related diseases. Methods: We searched up to June 5, 2022, for randomized controlled trials of gastric acid-related diseases that included erosive esophagitis, symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), peptic ulcers, and Helicobacter pylori infection. The pooled risk ratio (RR) was evaluated for the efficacy outcome and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) as the safety outcome. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the study findings. Results: Of the 710 screened studies, 19 studies including 7023 participants were analyzed. The RRs for the healing of erosive esophagitis with Vonoprazan versus PPI were 1.09 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03–1.14), 1.03 (95% CI 1.00–1.07), and 1.02 (95% CI 1.00–1.05) in Weeks 2, 4, and 8, respectively. There were no differences in the improvement of GERD symptoms and healing of gastric and duodenal ulcers between PCAB and PPI. The pooled eradication rates of H. pylori were significantly higher in Vonoprazan versus PPI first-line treatment (RR 1.13; 95% CI 1.04–1.22). The overall RR of TEAEs with Vonoprazan versus PPI was 1.08 (95% CI 0.89–1.31). Overall, the risk of bias was low to some concerns. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the study's conclusion. Conclusion: Vonoprazan is superior to PPI in first-line H. pylori eradication and erosive esophagitis but non-inferior in other gastric acid-related diseases. Likewise, short-term safety is comparable in both treatment groups. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
gastric acid-related diseases; meta-analysis; potassium-competitive acid blocker; proton pump inhibitor; vonoprazan
esomeprazole; lansoprazole; linaprazan; potassium competitive acid blocker; proton pump inhibitor; rabeprazole; tegoprazan; vonoprazan; potassium; proton pump inhibitor; adult; Article; clinical outcome; comparative effectiveness; drug efficacy; drug safety; duodenum ulcer; female; gastroesophageal reflux; healing rate; Helicobacter infection; human; male; meta analysis; outcome assessment; peptic ulcer; randomized controlled trial (topic); reflux esophagitis; sensitivity analysis; stomach acid; systematic review; treatment duration; unspecified side effect; Helicobacter infection; Helicobacter pylori; stomach acid; Gastric Acid; Helicobacter Infections; Helicobacter pylori; Humans; Potassium; Proton Pump Inhibitors
Universitas Indonesia
Financial support: This study was funded by the Universitas Indonesia's Hibah PUTI RA Q1 2022 under contract number NKB-746/UN2.RST/HKP.05.00/2022.
John Wiley and Sons Inc
08159319
36181401
Article
Q1
1063
3715